Evolution works in somewhat mysterious ways. Two birds at the same backyard feeder that look alike could be separated by millions of years of evolutionary history. Meanwhile, two birds that are each other’s closest evolutionary cousins could live on opposite sides of the world.
That mixing and matching of birds with different speciation histories is borne of two seemingly opposing forces of evolution. On the one hand, divergent evolution is pushing closely related species away from each other; natural selection (the race to enhance survival, such as being better at exploiting food resources or evading predators) pushes birds to gain an advantage by looking different or moving someplace different.
On the other hand, convergent evolution can push distantly related species to resemble each other. Again natural selection is a driving force. Bird species that eat flying insects tend to have similar aerodynamic body shapes (even if they aren’t close relatives), kind of like how different kinds of aquatic animals, such as fish and whales, similarly evolved elongated bodies and fins for swimming underwater.
This push and pull of divergent and convergent evolution can make for some surprises when birders dig into the phylogeny (that is, the evolutionary relationships) of some of their favorite birds. Try your hand at guessing which species might be most closely related in the following groupings of birds from your backyard and around the world. Physical resemblances or proximity to one another may be a helpful clue … but then again, maybe not.
Avian Phylogeny: An Evolutionary Tree for Birds
A phylogeny shows how species are related to one another and displays information about how long ago two or more species shared a common ancestor, revealing the greater patterns at play in evolution.
A clade is a portion of an evolutionary tree in which all the species descend from a common ancestor. In the snippet above from the phylogenetic tree in the order Bucerotiformes, any grouping of species that can be traced in their roots back to a single point form a clade—such as all of the scimitarbills and all of the woodhoopoes, or just Forest and Black Scimitarbills, or just Black-billed and Violet Woodhoopoes. Clades indicate direct lines of evolutionary descent.
DNA Tech Is Making Phylogenies Easier to Construct—and More Accurate
Historically scientists constructed phylogenies of birds by identifying shared physical traits; if two birds had similar beak shapes or vocal organ structures, it was inferred that they were closely related. But those kinds of inferences could be false due to convergent evolution. With the advent of modern genetic analysis techniques in the 1970s and 80s, scientists began looking for shared DNA sequences instead, which proved to be a far more accurate way of determining which birds are close evolutionary relatives. DNA sequencing also provides scientists with thousands of times more data, which means evolutionary comparisons can be conducted at much larger scales—resulting in larger and more accurate phylogenies.
Take the Quiz
Tap or click an image to reveal the answer. (Illustrations are not to scale.)
Phylogeny and Evolutionary Biology
Phylogenies can reveal how evolution plays out across space and time. For example, a geographic analysis of bird distributions ranked by their evolutionary relationships reveals that close relatives tend to be clustered together in their own groups in harsh climates and at high elevations (likely because these closely related birds all have traits that allow them to survive where other birds can’t). On the other hand, stable climates seem to support a wider diversity of evolutionary lineages, resulting in communities of birds with more distantly related species.
About the Author
Eliot Miller is an evolutionary biologist who leads the BirdsPlus Index at the American Bird Conservancy. He previously worked at the Cornell Lab of Ornithology, conducting evolutionary ecology research and helping to develop the automated sound identification technology for the Merlin Bird ID app.
The Open Tree of Life Project
The Open Tree of Life is an NSF-funded collaboration among several scientific institutions to create a dynamic, digital, and freely available phylogeny for all of the world’s organisms. Currently led by the University of California Merced and the University of Kansas, the project aims to build a comprehensive and continually updated evolutionary tree that’s posted online so scientists anywhere can easily access it. So far the Open Tree represents 2.4 million species including plants, mammals, amphibians, reptiles, and a complete evolutionary tree of all the world’s birds.
Illustrations from Lynx Edicions. First panel: Chimney Swift and Northern Rough-winged Swallow by Alex Mascarell Llosa; Leach’s Storm-Petrel by Juan Varela; Ruby-throated Hummingbird by Dave Nurney. Second panel: all illustrations by Ian Willis. Third panel: Peregrine Falcon by Hilary Burn; Sharp-shinned Hawk by Alan Harris; Osprey by Lluis Sanz; Red-lored Parrot by Norman Arlott. Fourth panel: Western Tanager and Brazilian Tanager by Hilary Burn; Northern Cardinal and Red-crested Cardinal by Brian Small. Fifth panel: Eastern Meadowlark, Chestnut-headed Oropendola, and Horned Lark by Tim Worfolk; Yellow-throated Longclaw by Ren Hathaway. Sixth panel: American Goldfinch by Hilary Burn; Saffron Finch by Brian Small; Verdin by Norman Arlott, Iiwi by Doug Pratt. Seventh panel: Kagu and Sungrebe by Lluis Sanz; Sunbittern by Alex Mascarell Llosa; Capped Heron by Francesc Jutglar. Eighth panel: Tawny-crowned Honeyeater by Tim Worfolk; Cape Sugarbird by Ian Lewington; White-fronted Chat by Chris Rose; Ruby-topaz Hummingbird by Hilary Burn.